All articles

For clinics

How to improve patient adherence between visits

Most of what changes a patient's health happens in the weeks between appointments. Here is what keeps patients on their plan and what quietly pulls them off it.

By Dr. Jean Paul Lim, MD, FRCPC · Intensivist and Complex Care Specialist · October 3, 2026 · 5 min read

A visit lasts an hour at most. The plan we make in that hour has to survive the weeks that follow. That is where most patients lose their way. Not because they don't care, but because life fills the space between appointments.

When clinicians ask me how to improve patient adherence, I point to the programs that have actually worked. The Diabetes Prevention Program reduced new cases of type 2 diabetes by 58%, compared with 31% for metformin [1]. It did that through structure: a 16-session core curriculum over 16 to 20 weeks, with patients tracking what they ate from the first week [2, 3]. The contact was the treatment.

What drifting off a plan actually looks like

I often ask patients to walk for 10 minutes after they eat. It is one of the simplest things they can do for their blood sugar. Then it rains, or it is cold, or they don't want to walk outside at night, or the sidewalk is uneven. Three months later they come back having done nothing. The fix takes ten seconds: walk around the house, or step up and down a single stair. The point was never the walk outside. It was moving for 10 minutes after eating.

Other times the instruction was unclear to them. They weren't sure whether I meant every meal or only certain ones, so they did none. Medications are the same. A patient can't remember whether I said once a day or twice, even though it is printed on the bottle, so they take it the wrong way until their next visit.

None of these are motivation problems. They are small questions that never got answered. Each one quietly costs months.

Patients don't need a document. They need a doctor.

For most patients, there isn't even a document. In a typical visit, people get verbal instructions, often several at once and sometimes in medical language that is hard to follow if you aren't in medicine. Then they are expected to go home and carry it all out.

The questions don't come up in the office. They come up later, when the patient actually tries to do what we asked. By then they are home and the chance to ask a simple question has passed. Many feel bad bothering the office about something that seems small or mundane, so they decide to wait until the next appointment. That wait is often months.

Bringing a partner or family member to the visit helps. A second person can listen and help make sense of the instructions. But once they are home, the conversation is between two people without medical training, answering each other's questions based on what they each think they heard.

Premium care doesn't fully solve this either. A beautiful report is what people expect from any premium service, but it can't answer a question on a Tuesday night. What changes behaviour is having someone who understands you and your plan, who is paying attention and who is there when the question actually comes up. Patients want to feel looked after between visits, not only during them.

In my experience, six things make the difference.

1. Make every goal clear, including why it matters

Patients follow instructions they understand. That means knowing exactly what to do and why they are being asked to do it. A patient who knows the walk is about blood sugar after meals will find a way to do it indoors. A patient who thinks it is about getting outside will skip it when it rains.

Clarity also means being able to ask. Most adherence problems start as a question: which meals, how many times a day, can I take this with food, what if I miss a dose. When the answer is days away, many patients guess or stop. When it is available that evening, they keep going.

2. Set goals that are specific, realistic and sized for this week

Big goals don't fail because they are wrong. They fail because there is no first step small enough to take this week. The goals that work are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound (SMART) and they start from where the patient is today, not where we hope they will be.

Take someone who is completely sedentary. Telling them to walk 45 minutes five days a week can be overwhelming before they even start. A better first goal might be a step tracker and 3,000 steps a day, then adding 1,000 steps every two weeks. For some patients that pace is too slow and for others too fast. Some shouldn't start with walking at all and a stationary bike or gentle stretching is the right first step. We have to understand where a patient is before we can set goals they can achieve and goals built that way leave patients feeling listened to.

Good programs ramp up deliberately. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), a large trial in adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes, found that a structured lifestyle program prevented nearly twice as many new cases as the drug metformin. It also started small: about 60 minutes of activity in the first week, building toward 150 [1, 3]. Habits also take time. In one study it took a median of 66 days for a new daily behaviour to become automatic, with a range of 18 to 254 days. Missing a day did not undo the progress [4]. Weekly goals should build on each other and a missed day should never reset a patient to zero.

3. Match the number of goals to the patient's readiness

Some patients can take on five changes at once. Others can only manage one goal at a time and giving them five means they do none. Readiness changes too, with stress, illness and life events. The right number of recommendations is the number this patient can actually carry right now and it should be revisited as they gain momentum.

How we have that conversation matters. A meta-analysis of 48 randomized trials found that motivational interviewing, which draws out the patient's own reasons for change, modestly but consistently improved outcomes, including weight loss and how well patients took their medications [5].

4. Check in regularly, with accountability that feels like care

Accountability is one of the strongest drivers of behaviour change. Most of us do better when someone holds us to our goals. That is the core of what a health coach does and a systematic review of health and wellness coaching describes accountability as one of its defining parts, alongside goals the patient chooses [8]. It is also the reason people hire personal trainers.

Accountability only works when it is built on the right foundation. It needs trust, which means the plan comes from the patient's own clinician and stays under their oversight. It needs understanding, which means whoever checks in knows the patient's history, results and what has got in the way before. And it has to feel like a relationship: progress noticed, achievements acknowledged and setbacks met with support rather than judgment.

Regular contact keeps a plan alive. Self-monitoring is one of the most reliable predictors of progress: in one online program, people who logged their food at least twice a day on at least 20 days a month were more likely to lose more than 5% of their weight [6]. In a long-term study of weight-loss maintenance, emotional support was one of the factors linked to keeping weight off [7]. Patients can tell the difference between being monitored and being looked after. The second one keeps them engaged.

5. Advice should come from someone they trust

Patients act on recommendations from people they trust. The same advice lands very differently coming from their own clinician than from a stranger online. It matters where digital advice comes from too. Consumer wellness apps and the coaching built into popular wearables give general advice, but no clinician has reviewed it or is overseeing it. Advice carries weight when it comes from the patient's own care team, or from a tool their care team supervises.

That trust is built by knowing the patient: their history, their results, what they have tried before and what got in the way.

6. Bring someone in to help

Health habits are rarely individual. Families eat the same meals, keep the same hours and share the same routines. When someone close is involved, the walk after dinner becomes something they do together and the plan has an ally at home instead of a competing set of habits.

Where it makes sense, I try to include a support person. That could be a spouse, a child, a friend or anyone who can help hold them accountable. It works best when that support person can also bring their own questions to the care team, instead of the two of them relying on what they remember from the visit.

Use the patient's own data as feedback

People stay with a plan when they can see it working. Wearable data, logged habits and repeat lab work all show patients that their effort is paying off, long before the next appointment. The key is to read that data in the context of their plan, so a bad night of sleep is a reason to adjust today's goal, not a reason to give up.

Every practitioner knows this. Time is the problem.

None of this is new to anyone in practice. Every practitioner knows these fundamentals and wants to provide them. What gets in the way is time. More patients, more demands and shorter visits limit how much any one practitioner can check in, clarify and follow up.

That is one of the real advantages of a multidisciplinary team. A nutritionist, a trainer and a nurse can each carry part of the load. But more practitioners bring back the problem I described earlier: more instructions from more people. Patients end up with information overload, feel overwhelmed and too often end up doing nothing.

So the answer isn't simply more people. It is support that has the time and turns everything the care team asks into one clear plan the patient can actually follow.

How FORME helps

FORME was built for exactly this gap. It brings the care team's instructions together into one practitioner-approved plan, broken into SMART weekly goals sized to where the patient is, so more input doesn't mean more overload. The accountability rests on the same foundation described above: trust, because every plan is approved and overseen by the patient's practitioner; understanding, because the coach holds the patient's full context; and relationship, because it notices progress, celebrates milestones and acknowledges what the patient has achieved. A FORME coach checks in, knows their labs, wearables and your clinic's instructions and can answer the small questions any time: which meals, once a day or twice, what to do when it rains. Couples can be enrolled together so the coach lines up their shared habits while each keeps their own plan. Your team sees who is on track and who is drifting, so you can step in early.

Want to see how FORME supports your patients between visits?

Book a walkthrough

References

  1. Knowler WC, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012512
  2. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/25/12/2165/22085/The-Diabetes-Prevention-Program-DPP-Description-of
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Coach Guide, Core Sessions 1 to 16. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/28571/cdc_28571_DS1.pdf
  4. Lally P, et al. How are habits formed: modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2010. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ejsp.674
  5. Lundahl B, et al. Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.012
  6. Harvey J, et al. Log often, lose more: electronic dietary self-monitoring for weight loss. Obesity. 2019. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/oby.22382
  7. Phelan S, Wing RR, et al. Prevalence and predictors of weight-loss maintenance in a biracial cohort (CARDIA). Am J Prev Med. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.008
  8. Wolever RQ, et al. A systematic review of the literature on health and wellness coaching. Glob Adv Health Med. 2013. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2013.042

This article is for general education and isn't medical advice for any individual. Talk with your own clinician before changing medications or starting a new program.